spektr vs Taktile
Different missions. Different strengths. One clear choice (depending on what you’re building).
Credit decisions or compliance orchestration?
They’re both brilliant, but they’re built for totally different jobs. Let’s not compare apples to onboarding workflows.
The Taktile way
Taktile is a decisioning platform designed for credit. It’s all about smarter lending logic, risk scoring, and financial precision. If your world revolves around credit models and loan approvals, they’ve got you covered.
The spektr way
spektr is an orchestration platform for compliance and onboarding. Think dynamic workflows, automated KYC/KYB, and smoother verification processes (without the tangle of code or complexity). If you’re building user trust and compliance flows, this is your zone.
Taktile is built for credit brilliance — scoring, modelling, and decisioning at speed. spektr lives in a different universe: onboarding and compliance orchestration. When you’re crafting flows, connecting data, automating KYC/KYB, or keeping regulators happy, spektr covers the ground that Taktile simply isn’t aiming for.
How does Taktile compare with spektr?
Side-by-side, so you can see what each really offers.
The “Hmm…” Moments with Taktile
Strong decisioning, but missing the flow-building magic.
Not built for complex onboarding flows
Hard to cover full KYC/KYB needs
Limited support for local or niche data sources
Missing tools for compliance lifecycle automation
