spektr vs Alloy
Two orchestration platforms. Two sides of the pond. One key difference in focus.
API orchestration or no-code process building?
Both help you automate compliance — but our playgrounds (and philosophies) are a little different.
The Alloy way
Alloy is a U.S.-based orchestration platform made for AML and compliance API integration. If you’re a U.S. company looking to plug in best-of-breed providers and streamline credit and AML flows, Alloy’s your local hero.
The spektr way
spektr takes a broader, more flexible approach - a process builder for onboarding, monitoring, remediation, and beyond. With a no-code interface and API power, spektr is designed for global teams who want to orchestrate everything end-to-end, no matter where they operate.
Alloy and spektr both help teams automate compliance — but they grew up with different missions. Alloy is built around API orchestration in the U.S. ecosystem. spektr is built for global teams who want to design, automate, and adapt onboarding and compliance processes end-to-end, without leaning on engineering for every change.
How does Alloy compare with spektr?
Side-by-side, so you can see what each really offers.
Data aggregator integrations
Integrations with major data aggregators like Dun & Bradstreet
Direct integrations with national registries
Large number of direct integrations with national registries like the German Handelsregister or Swedish Bolagsverket
Local eID integrations
Direct integration of national eIDs like itsme, iDin, mojeID, MitID, etc.
Bring your own service (and we integrate)
Enabling you to use your existing services and contracts via spektr
Specialized AI agents
Single-function AI agents, specialized on one specific task
AI agent builder
Enabling you to build your own AI-agents based on your specific requirements
ISO-certified AI
ISO 42001 certification
The “Hmm…” Moments with Alloy
Where API wiring stops and workflow building begins.
Focused mainly on U.S. data and providers
Limited tools for global compliance workflows
Limited local registry or eID coverage
Harder to build end-to-end processes visually
